Got you loud and clear.

Got you loud and clear.
Re: Re: What am I implying? -- DD	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by:
cq ^Ž

09/20/2004, 02:08:36
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators

I obviously was reading into your post something that you hadn't intended.

Thanks for clearing that up.

Only one other comment I'd make here - grieving is certainly part of the process, and the closure/acceptance stage of leaving a cult can be more difficult than having to come to terms with someone's death. With the cult situation, one has to stop regretting the past.

And that's different ball-game, IMO.

Recommend Current page

Replies to this message

I'm not sure you did cq. --- DD ( Mon, Sep 20, 2004, 14:57:45 ) ( 4433 bytes ) +1

Be sure. (no text) --- cq ( Mon, Sep 20, 2004, 16:34:58 ) ( 0 bytes )

Elizabeth Kubler-Ross --- Dr.wow ( Tue, Sep 21, 2004, 00:07:00 ) ( 432 bytes ) +3

I didn't realise DD was Deputy Dog (thought his tone was familiar though) (no text) --- cq ( Tue, Sep 21, 2004, 01:47:03 ) ( 0 bytes )
The Kubler-Ross steps worked for me - just giving "satsang" (no text) --- DD ( Tue, Sep 21, 2004, 10:16:10 ) ( 0 bytes )
Re: Elizabeth Kubler-Ross --- DD ( Tue, Sep 21, 2004, 12:13:54 ) ( 3367 bytes ) link