- if they'd have significant numbers they'd show those and not percentages. --- Toby ( Sun, Mar 13, 2005, 04:22:04 ) ( 45 bytes )
- Cynthia, your math is a little wayward --- JHB ( Sun, Mar 13, 2005, 04:51:44 ) ( 654 bytes ) +2
- I think it was 200 iin 2003, so 300% increase would be 600 in 2004 --- Joe ( Sun, Mar 13, 2005, 13:12:52 ) ( 747 bytes ) +1
- actually it is even more vague than that. --- dant ( Sun, Mar 13, 2005, 15:44:36 ) ( 820 bytes ) +3
- Maybe they don't wanna seem to be boasting (no text) --- hamzen ( Sun, Mar 13, 2005, 16:06:59 ) ( 0 bytes )
- Excellent Observation, Dant!!! The vagueness is telling... --- la-ex ( Sun, Mar 13, 2005, 22:08:34 ) ( 705 bytes ) +1
- Good point, dant -- they are even bigger liars than I thought (no text) --- Joe ( Mon, Mar 14, 2005, 11:45:21 ) ( 0 bytes )
|
|