To bore or not to bore, that is the question
Re: Boring keys? -- Doc	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Will ® 12/10/2004, 09:13:14 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

Doc, I'm not sure I want to talk/post to you.  Since I use my real, full name, I prefer to communicate with similarly identifiable people.  We named-ones are more accountable for our statements.  But I guess I will account for the statement I made which you challenge, namely the boring quality of the Keys.   First, though, let me say that I really think you are being less than candid (as you always are on these forums) about the "straws" that may have bothered you.  You only admit to one - the UN example, and that is a rather benign one. Now: yes, I have to admit that the Keys might contain video passages that will be interesting and entertaining to premies, even maybe to me!  I admit that I am still interested and entertained by my former guru and certain stuff about him I like to know.  Maybe the Keys videos will have some back-stage scenes.  Maybe even smoking back-stage scenes.  That would be very interesting.   But alas, I am afraid that mostly the Keys will be the same old stuff, namely video of Rawat talking at events about how humans get confused in their daily lives and how they all lack fulfillment and how they all should go inside to find a certain fulfilling something-or-other.  This is a message that I find does NOT require years of repeated exposure, and years of repeated exposure produces boredom. So the real test (about boring or not) will be in viewing the Keys videos, which I will not be doing.  Please do let me know if there is anything worthy about them.

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

Well for a start... --- Doc ( Sat, Dec 11, 2004, 20:46:15 ) ( 352 bytes ) +1 Well, for a finish. --- Will ( Mon, Dec 13, 2004, 09:30:37 ) ( 2356 bytes ) +1 Well, stumbling on for a moment --- Doc ( Tue, Dec 14, 2004, 07:17:42 ) ( 2295 bytes ) +1 Well, just a inch further --- Will ( Tue, Dec 14, 2004, 09:32:47 ) ( 5889 bytes ) +2 The very interesting thing here, Will --- Tempora ( Tue, Dec 14, 2004, 15:41:33 ) ( 3872 bytes ) +1 Come on, Tempora, you can't be serious --- Jim ( Tue, Dec 14, 2004, 16:52:45 ) ( 1854 bytes ) more like a mile! --- Doc ( Wed, Dec 15, 2004, 09:42:17 ) ( 7661 bytes ) +3 Ending on a high note --- Will ( Wed, Dec 15, 2004, 14:02:17 ) ( 135 bytes ) Why is this arrogant vicious FOOL posting here? --- gerry ( Wed, Dec 15, 2004, 23:09:16 ) ( 355 bytes ) +2 Because some people are not vicious angry pricks that's why --- Doc ( Thu, Dec 16, 2004, 20:52:06 ) ( 307 bytes ) +1 You reveled in Jagdeo's crimes, Roupell --- gerry ( Thu, Dec 16, 2004, 23:40:40 ) ( 95 bytes ) Gerry..stop preaching... --- Lexy ( Fri, Dec 17, 2004, 03:59:03 ) ( 1686 bytes ) +1 You're a newbie, Lex, one of hundreds, I know... --- gerry ( Fri, Dec 17, 2004, 12:29:45 ) ( 628 bytes ) +1 Sensitive and negative interpreting. --- Lexy ( Fri, Dec 17, 2004, 16:22:55 ) ( 3908 bytes ) +1 Re: Sensitive and negative interpreting. --- Jim ( Fri, Dec 17, 2004, 16:27:33 ) ( 216 bytes ) +2 Re: Sensitive and negative interpreting. --- Lexy ( Fri, Dec 17, 2004, 16:41:02 ) ( 53 bytes ) Re: Sensitive and negative interpreting. --- Doc ( Fri, Dec 17, 2004, 22:46:07 ) ( 585 bytes ) +1 Re: Sensitive and negative interpreting. --- Lexy ( Sat, Dec 18, 2004, 05:15:31 ) ( 664 bytes ) +1 I can tell you're in a hurry --- Doc ( Sun, Dec 19, 2004, 08:24:06 ) ( 1069 bytes ) +1 Re: I can tell you're in a hurry --- Lexy ( Sun, Dec 19, 2004, 18:29:22 ) ( 3236 bytes ) img +1 Rush hour --- Doc ( Mon, Dec 20, 2004, 01:29:33 ) ( 3706 bytes ) Yeah Doc! Keep bleeding! --- Sulla ( Thu, Dec 16, 2004, 15:48:22 ) ( 1080 bytes ) +1 Good post Sulla --- gerry ( Thu, Dec 16, 2004, 20:48:49 ) ( 52 bytes )