Of course if you are going to be unsympathetic towards Maharaji, you could make a big deal over his definition of "God". Just like I could make a big deal out of you saying you are an "ex-premie". I could say that since "premie" means "lover of God" or "lover of truth", you are therefore clearly implying that you are now an "ex-lover of God", an "ex-lover of truth", that you used to be a lover of God, a lover of truth, but now you have clearly implied you are no longer a lover of God, no longer a lover of truth. Maybe that's not a great example, but I hope you get the point - that logically I could make that argument, if I was unsympathetic to what you really mean, if I refused to acknowledge the context in which it was said, if I wished to be simplistically literal about the meaning of "ex-premie".

This is complete bullshit, GOK.  Again, you're just throwing up smoke.  No one but you wants to "make a big deal" over Rawat's definition of God.  The whole point -- once again -- is that he claimed to be God and now lies and says he didn't. 

As for what ex-premie means, again, you're just uttering nonsense.  We all know what ex-premie means, it's a former follower of Rawat's. If there was any question about that, all you'd have to do is ask us and we'll tell you.  Any "misunderstanding" would be a lie.  So you're damn right that wouldn't be a good example.