- Re: going back to the fold..... --- toby ( Tue, Oct 05, 2004, 05:42:14 ) ( 271 bytes ) +2
- Re: going back to the fold..... --- Thorin ( Tue, Oct 05, 2004, 06:13:55 ) ( 698 bytes ) link +3
- Re: going back to the fold..... --- darren ( Tue, Oct 05, 2004, 06:28:46 ) ( 294 bytes ) +4
- thanks for clarification on your POV (no text) --- toby ( Tue, Oct 05, 2004, 06:46:35 ) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: going back to the fold..... --- Thorin ( Tue, Oct 05, 2004, 07:06:05 ) ( 632 bytes ) +1
- Well Derwood --- dant ( Tue, Oct 05, 2004, 07:08:39 ) ( 834 bytes ) +1
- Jean Michel should have used the past simple tense...... --- Lexy ( Tue, Oct 05, 2004, 09:36:06 ) ( 1162 bytes ) +2
- Thanks for the English lesson !! --- Jean-Michel ( Tue, Oct 05, 2004, 10:16:41 ) ( 50 bytes )
- So, Lexy, how would you say in French --- Tempora ( Thu, Oct 07, 2004, 12:58:37 ) ( 85 bytes ) +1
- Au secours ! Dur Dur ! --- Lexy ( Thu, Oct 07, 2004, 15:04:32 ) ( 374 bytes ) +1
- Re: Au secours ! Dur Dur ! --- Tempora ( Thu, Oct 07, 2004, 16:42:22 ) ( 1011 bytes ) +1
- Have you read Jean-Michel's "Journey" - Version Francaise ? --- Lexy ( Thu, Oct 07, 2004, 17:48:05 ) ( 271 bytes ) link +3
- Version Francaise Officielle !! --- Jean-Michel ( Fri, Oct 08, 2004, 02:41:01 ) ( 180 bytes )
- Merci --- Will ( Fri, Oct 08, 2004, 09:18:18 ) ( 82 bytes )
- It's interesting, but vastly too long --- Tempora ( Sat, Oct 09, 2004, 04:42:31 ) ( 241 bytes ) +1
- Re: sentence totally out of context --- darren ( Tue, Oct 05, 2004, 07:55:31 ) ( 157 bytes ) +1
- NOT going back to the fold..... --- Jean-Michel ( Tue, Oct 05, 2004, 08:02:11 ) ( 141 bytes ) +1
- You're kidding, right? --- Neville B ( Tue, Oct 05, 2004, 06:18:43 ) ( 246 bytes ) +1
Go back to your fold, Darren... --- Cynthia ( Tue, Oct 05, 2004, 09:25:05 ) ( 659 bytes ) link +1
|
|