Thanks for explaining that you're usually right in these cases and if I don't agree it's because I haven't understood something. Maybe we need to set the scene and ensure we aren't talking at cross purposes. If you believed that it is/was completely innocuous when people, no matter how persuasive or enthusiastic they are, are trying to convince you that God has incarnated in short and tubby human form to save the planet and can reveal the experience of God to you and all you have to do is ..... then I guess you walked into a trap. However there are certain things you are expected to learn while growing up without necessarily being overtly taught them and one of those is a natural suspicion when you are being promised the world and even more than that the greatest experience in the universe for nothing. Caveat emptor I believe it's called.
When I was approached about Knowledge I entered the world of DLM with my eyes open and the knowledge that I was trying something that was extremely unlikely to be true and I accept responsibility for my foolishness. If you didn't even have that basic understanding then I guess your blundered into a trap without any prior understanding. Fair enough. But when words are defined there is an expectation that their meaning is set by normal human expereince and using that idea DLM was not a hidden trap but one out in the open for anyone to see. Why do you think 99% of people told about Rawat and his "Knowledge" went "No Thanks" and headed for the nearest exit?
