Let's look more carefully at your thinking. Let's consider some hypothetical person who has good reason to feel betrayed by Rawat. Sure, they'll feel negative about the guy -- I mean, he lied to them and misled them, right? He led them on a right merry dance, up the garden path and into the marshes of self doubt and religious delusion. How do you specify what would constitute a realistic level of negativity for a person who discovers they are one of many to have been systematically jerked around like that, and that the perpetrator is intent on continuing his deception on new recruits?

You *need* to answer the point, for, if you cannot calibrate what would constitute a realistic level of negativity under those circumstances, how can you possibly assess what is unreasonable? So, exactly how would you assess a realistic level of negativity for the posters here to display? I think we should be told!

If you cannot answer then perhaps you should spend some more time on your *own* exiting process (from being suckered by Sai Baba, I understand) before coming here to advise ex-premies on theirs.