With apologies to Ray, I wonder if Georgia Tech administrators would be interested to know more about the "other side" of prem's teachings....
Seriously, since academic institutions pride themselves on teaching young people how to think for themselves and see all sides to an issue, I wonder if they would show an interest in
"the rest of the story"...should the "teacher' of this "course' be obligated to at least mention the existence of the EPO site in the course, and then be prepared to defend the "challenge' put up by EPO? Kind of like the warning that cigarette manufacturers have to put on the cigarette pack?
If university facilities are being used for this "course", does that mean that tax payers are indirectly supporting the "course"...?
Not sure how that's going to play in the bible belt.....wonder what Zell Miller thinks..
