I see you have followed through on the information I have posted. You correctly identify that all matters are referred to the Magistrates Court for a Pre-Hearing and an assessment on the basis of law by the Magistrate as to whether the Defendant actually has a case to answer.Do you understand that by waiving his right to defend himself and not attending J Mc has progressed the matter to a new level?

Attendance on a Supreme Court order is NOT optional. Hence the arrest warrant now operative.

But here's what has been puzzling me Tom. You were caught red-handed downloading other peoples information. You filed an affadavit with Scattini which provided damning evidence against JMc(which you later tried to unsuccessfully recant).Strangely you were not named as a co-defendant in the action taken against JMc by Laver and Co. Why notSurely you were deserving of the same vigour and pursuit? Unless......