This is what cults do to people --- Steve ( Sun, Apr 15, 2012, 16:49:52 ) (343 reads) ( 868 bytes ) +48
|
You got me, Steve. That was a good one! (no text) --- lakeshore ( Sun, Apr 15, 2012, 17:34:28 ) (57 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- So actually Watson was pretty clever... --- Mike Finch ( Sun, Apr 15, 2012, 17:50:53 ) (201 reads) ( 432 bytes )
- Re: This is what cults do to people --- Lonecat ( Sun, Apr 15, 2012, 18:24:01 ) (140 reads) ( 83 bytes )
- Re: This is what cults do to people --- karenl ( Sun, Apr 15, 2012, 20:27:50 ) (161 reads) ( 3813 bytes ) +2
- Re: Religions and Hell --- ocker ( Mon, Apr 16, 2012, 02:39:32 ) (146 reads) ( 127 bytes ) +4
- Ohhhh! --- 13 ( Mon, Apr 16, 2012, 03:28:22 ) (129 reads) ( 99 bytes )
- Two is enough for the theory to work (no text) --- Lonecat ( Mon, Apr 16, 2012, 04:48:29 ) (58 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: Religions and Hell --- karenl ( Mon, Apr 16, 2012, 06:04:53 ) (122 reads) ( 76 bytes )
- Re: Religions and Hell. Buddhism has its own depiction of hell --- cq ( Mon, Apr 16, 2012, 12:13:19 ) (147 reads) ( 260 bytes ) link img +1
Heaven? or Hell? --- karenl ( Mon, Apr 16, 2012, 16:09:07 ) (145 reads) ( 291 bytes ) img +2
- <chortle> Let me guess - it's the Hotel California? --- cq ( Tue, Apr 17, 2012, 07:07:45 ) (107 reads) ( 61 bytes )
- Premie Plan --- Susan ( Wed, Apr 18, 2012, 23:33:49 ) (189 reads) ( 195 bytes ) link +2
- Re: Premie Plan --- Mike Finch ( Thu, Apr 19, 2012, 07:01:45 ) (207 reads) ( 832 bytes ) link +1
- Re: If I was Rennie Davis --- ocker ( Thu, Apr 19, 2012, 14:01:38 ) (148 reads) ( 284 bytes ) +1
- Re: If I was Rennie Davis --- karenl ( Thu, Apr 19, 2012, 15:35:47 ) (147 reads) ( 228 bytes ) img +2
Brilliant, Karen --- lakeshore ( Thu, Apr 19, 2012, 17:00:16 ) (118 reads) ( 91 bytes )
- Re: If I was Rennie Davis --- swimming free ( Thu, Apr 19, 2012, 18:33:50 ) (185 reads) ( 614 bytes ) img +1
- Rennie Davis... --- Mike Finch ( Thu, Apr 19, 2012, 19:27:16 ) (179 reads) ( 1021 bytes ) +2
- Here's Rennie Davis's letter to me from 2006 --- JHB ( Fri, Apr 20, 2012, 05:20:26 ) (198 reads) ( 10.8 KB ) +6
- He sounds like a New Age Bill Clinton! --- karenl ( Fri, Apr 20, 2012, 06:08:16 ) (139 reads) ( 1050 bytes ) +1
- Oh yes, I was wrong there... --- Mike Finch ( Fri, Apr 20, 2012, 06:15:25 ) (198 reads) ( 508 bytes ) +1
Re: Oh yes, I was wrong there...really! --- Steve ( Fri, Apr 20, 2012, 21:17:19 ) (111 reads) ( 1001 bytes ) +1
- Yes really --- Mike Finch ( Sat, Apr 21, 2012, 06:41:24 ) (120 reads) ( 898 bytes ) +2
- Yeah, Rennie's statments were not exactly nuanced. (no text) --- Steve ( Sat, Apr 21, 2012, 08:03:37 ) (48 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: Yes really ... but no, really! --- cq ( Sat, Apr 21, 2012, 09:03:45 ) (98 reads) ( 1014 bytes )
- I think the reason for the apology to Rawat is clear --- aunt bea ( Fri, Apr 20, 2012, 07:40:17 ) (172 reads) ( 442 bytes ) +2
- Good analysis, spot on (no text) --- Mike Finch ( Fri, Apr 20, 2012, 08:09:09 ) (48 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Nah, the apology gives rennie an angle of power. --- Lonecat ( Sat, Apr 21, 2012, 11:52:55 ) (100 reads) ( 11 bytes ) +1
- It's solipsism writ large (no text) --- Steve ( Sun, Apr 22, 2012, 13:51:08 ) (51 reads) ( 0 bytes ) +1
- Rennie Davis's letter from 2006 plus the ex-premie responses --- Steve ( Fri, Apr 20, 2012, 11:15:16 ) (154 reads) ( 236 bytes ) link +1
Not much of an apology is it? --- Steve ( Fri, Apr 20, 2012, 12:32:59 ) (143 reads) ( 1082 bytes ) link +1
Does 'Private Eye' still run Pseuds Corner --- tommo ( Fri, Apr 20, 2012, 19:14:23 ) (130 reads) ( 952 bytes ) +1
- Re: Rennie Davis... --- swimming free ( Fri, Apr 20, 2012, 08:37:58 ) (198 reads) ( 940 bytes ) +2
- Thanks for the explanation (no text) --- Mike Finch ( Fri, Apr 20, 2012, 10:16:23 ) (50 reads) ( 0 bytes )
- Re: Rennie Davis... --- bill burke ( Sun, Apr 22, 2012, 08:29:16 ) (112 reads) ( 158 bytes )
-
Another good one! (no text) --- lakeshore ( Mon, Apr 16, 2012, 05:47:56 ) (51 reads) ( 0 bytes )
|
|