How the hell did you get that interpretation out of what I said, PatD. What kind of glasses are you wearing? I said:"As wonderful as Knowledge is - for people who are genuinely interested in Knowledge - it is obviously not the answer for people who are not interested in Knowledge and who are suffering from depression. So what kind of things CAN benefit people who are suffering from depression (and who are definitely not interested in Knowledge - leaving aside the question of whether or not Knowledge can help a depressed person who IS interested in Knowledge)?"
You have imagined an implication - "He seemed to me to me to be implying that Rawat has helped cure people who suffer from distressing mental conditions" - which clearly is not there.
