it is utter nonsense to argue that M never got anything 'right'. This would be impossible even if he tried.

Why is it that some ex's feel the need to paint a picture of such complete negation? 

Once again we have premies for whom M cannot do anything 'wrong' and ex premies for whom he cannot do anyhing 'right'. One can excuse premies for refusing to 'grow up' because growing up is not on the agenda for them but what is the ex's excuse?