I think Jim has made his point that Maharaji used the words "Lord" and "God" interchangably. Instead of simply conceding this, you point out that he "also said" blah, blah, whatever.

The simple fact is that there is a wealth of evidence that Maharaji did present himself as God in the flesh. Yes, he has also claimed not to be God, and there is evidence to support that as well. But doesn't that just make it all bizarre, how a guy can proclaim himself God, and then say he's not? Not only that, but to deny that he ever even made such grandiose statements. And if it's not being denied, it's being downplayed as simply a "cultural" misunderstanding? Sheesh!

I think Jim's right. You're just not strong enough to deal with it. It takes a certain amount of integrity, and you've given no indication that you posess it.