|
|
|
The Wikki spokesperson says "[that] the sexual misconduct was reported to Prem Rawat beginning in 1977 is just an ungrounded POV, and substancially (sic) incorrect". I wonder if "A" (name withheld on request) or Susan would be willing to put this person straight? The fact is that the abuse occured in the 1970s, didn't it? That EV got to hear of it nearly a quarter of a century later says much. Why, I wonder, is it being disputed that the victims of Jagdeo's abuse reported it to Rawat, or at least one (or more) of his underlings in DLM/EV? Ungrounded? Substantially incorrect? - That is an opinionated judgement which has to be a deeply wounding insult to the victims. So much for a "neutral" POV from the Wikki editors.
Modified by cq at Wed, Oct 06, 2004, 15:56:32
|
