>Please excuse my ignorance. If you will direct me to something that I can read to intelligently answer your question, I would be happy to offer my ideas on that<

The links Cynthia posted deal with Introvigne.

I've argued fervently in the past that a 'spiritual' expression of exism is as important as any other. I do think though that any 'spiritual' approach has to be very carefully presented - the problem is that there are far fewer agreed points of referrence between those holding contrary views, than issues of finance or law or psychology.

As someone who is more interested in a  prosaic critique than a deeply philosophical one, I do get frustrated with many of the 'spiritual' critiques of Rawatism that have appeared on the forums because they take up a large amount of bandwidth without having any obvious translation to addressing a wider audience. And personally a wider audience and a wider context - cults, abuse of tax status etc, is what interests me.