Replies to this message

You think? --- Joe ( Tue, Jun 28, 2005, 17:24:18 ) ( 1595 bytes ) +2 Re: You think? --- NikW ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 09:40:08 ) ( 261 bytes ) +1 Yes, you must.... --- Joe ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 12:06:50 ) ( 250 bytes ) Hi, Joe --- Tempora ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 13:38:37 ) ( 2960 bytes ) +1 Hi Tempora, I agree, but not necessarily the emphasis --- Joe ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 15:04:08 ) ( 1091 bytes ) In partial defence of Gubler --- JHB ( Tue, Jun 28, 2005, 20:39:21 ) ( 899 bytes ) +1 Wasn't Gubler trying to save his marriage, too? --- Joe ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 12:11:51 ) ( 724 bytes ) It's well known where he fits in --- Deep Throat ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 04:45:14 ) ( 488 bytes ) +1 And how would YOU know this? --- Joe ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 12:03:36 ) ( 269 bytes ) +1 Re: And how would YOU know this? --- Babaluji ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 15:06:07 ) ( 79 bytes ) Mythmaking, Conspiracies and the Avoidance of uncomfortable truths --- NikW ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 06:53:33 ) ( 2120 bytes ) +2 I don't what the hell you are talking about, dude --- gerry ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 08:06:44 ) ( 92 bytes ) +1 Re: I don't what the hell you are talking about, dude --- NikW ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 09:27:16 ) ( 2399 bytes ) +1 I disagree, Nik --- gerry ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 11:19:18 ) ( 1396 bytes ) +1 Why didn't Gubler send the docs to EPO? --- gerry ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 11:40:52 ) ( 221 bytes ) +2 Why it would be perjury --- JHB ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 12:22:14 ) ( 1443 bytes ) Re: Why didn't Gubler send the docs to EPO? --- nya ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 15:22:36 ) ( 1809 bytes ) The entire sorry incident was John's fault from the start --- Jim ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 12:33:04 ) ( 646 bytes ) +1 That's just silly, Jim --- gerry ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 13:10:19 ) ( 1012 bytes ) +3 Re: That's just silly, Jim --- nya ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 15:29:30 ) ( 750 bytes ) Re: That's just silly, Jim --- PatD ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 18:46:30 ) ( 428 bytes ) +1 Nya seems to have the best information about this, Pat --- gerry ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 19:36:44 ) ( 186 bytes ) I was being faceitious --- Jim ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 20:41:58 ) ( 181 bytes ) +1 faceitious? Isn't that some sort of joint disease? --- gerry ( Wed, Jun 29, 2005, 23:00:28 ) ( 663 bytes ) +1 Sounds fishy to me --- Marshall ( Thu, Jun 30, 2005, 01:07:13 ) ( 563 bytes ) +3 Sounds stupid to me --- NikW ( Thu, Jun 30, 2005, 02:40:19 ) ( 1408 bytes ) +2 Why are you jumping on the guy, Nik? --- gerry ( Thu, Jun 30, 2005, 09:26:35 ) ( 507 bytes ) Heh --- Marshall ( Thu, Jun 30, 2005, 13:18:18 ) ( 434 bytes ) Marshall, explain why they revealed the names of Amaroo lenders --- JHB ( Thu, Jun 30, 2005, 04:23:58 ) ( 510 bytes ) +1 Holy Heck, John !!! --- gerry ( Thu, Jun 30, 2005, 09:30:28 ) ( 319 bytes ) +1 No, I missed that, Gerry --- JHB ( Thu, Jun 30, 2005, 10:33:23 ) ( 246 bytes ) +1 How convenient --- gerry ( Thu, Jun 30, 2005, 10:44:06 ) ( 73 bytes ) +1 that's a joke, btw. (no text) --- gerry ( Thu, Jun 30, 2005, 10:48:39 ) ( 0 bytes ) Marshall, rather OTT I would say, but --- Jethro ( Thu, Jun 30, 2005, 05:52:13 ) ( 95 bytes ) +1 I never thought of that, jethro --- gerry ( Thu, Jun 30, 2005, 09:41:21 ) ( 261 bytes ) +1 all cult leaders do that: Has the king got no clothes on again --- Jethro ( Thu, Jun 30, 2005, 14:44:51 ) ( 1009 bytes )