For what it's worth, I agree

For what it's worth, I agree
Re: Re: Similar data, we just disagree, Nar -- lars	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by:
Joe ^Ž

04/08/2005, 17:11:31
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators

I don't think there is anything to be gained by putting up unflattering, stop-motion pictures of somebody like Joan. We may feel she shares responsbility with Rawat, and perhaps is now providing cover for him, but I think we can address that on the merits and we don't need those pictures.

Recommend Current page

Replies to this message

Ah, but Joe.... they are funny! --- NAR ( Fri, Apr 08, 2005, 17:19:53 ) ( 852 bytes ) +1

But, I swear to god that I wasn't going for a laugh. --- Babaluji ( Sat, Apr 09, 2005, 02:55:08 ) ( 207 bytes ) link +1

Maybe not, but "laugh," I did! --- NAR ( Sun, Apr 10, 2005, 09:39:58 ) ( 1822 bytes ) +2

Not only might the PAMs be masochists, but worse... --- Babaluji ( Sun, Apr 10, 2005, 16:51:26 ) ( 112 bytes )
Re: Maybe not, but "laugh," I did! --- Mike Finch ( Mon, Apr 11, 2005, 09:33:55 ) ( 2282 bytes ) +1

Thanks, Mike! --- NAR ( Mon, Apr 11, 2005, 09:40:18 ) ( 777 bytes )

Well, you got my stop-motion pictures of Joan anyway. --- Babaluji ( Sat, Apr 09, 2005, 00:16:21 ) ( 948 bytes )
Re: --- bill ( Sun, Apr 10, 2005, 00:34:17 ) ( 603 bytes )