An apology and a retraction. LOL
Re: Re: TPRF Pop Goes the Weasel -- Premie response	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by: Cynthia ® 01/15/2005, 20:13:29 Author Profile Edit Alert Moderators

What exes and NikW in particular fail to grasp is that TPRF was founded and funded to promote Prem Rawat's message. If TPRF decided to use all its funds to put out all of Maharaji's talks in pidgin English, they would be perfectly entitled to do so. The fact that TPRF is using its resources to raise funds for Tsunami victims is going above and beyond its duty. TPRF's desire to help is a natural response to such a huge tragedy, what is harder to understand is why when some exes resort to blatant lies and distortions to try to damage TPRF, no exes step forward to defend the truth. Hold on! I think I know the answer What premies seem to fail to grasp is that a U.S. 501c(3) corporation exists at the expense of the United States taxpayers.  Rawat's foundation gets the luxury of a tax-free status.  Don't forget.  It answers to the IRS.  So knock off the insults and that includes you Mr/Ms Yadot1 below.  EV is designated as a church in the U.S.  Don't forget that too.  But, since the both of you seem to be so in the know about these two entities, I agree with Pat, tell us all about the money.  Modified by Cynthia at Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 20:16:32

Previous

Recommend Current page

Next

Replies to this message

An apology and a retraction? --- Premie response ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 21:52:49 ) ( 699 bytes ) +2 Are you from the U.S.? --- Cynthia ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 05:43:34 ) ( 1310 bytes ) +1 Are you from the IRS.? --- Premie response ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 15:17:23 ) ( 1859 bytes ) +2 Are you from Premworld? --- Dermot M ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 18:11:51 ) ( 2685 bytes ) +2 ***BEST OF FORUM*** Very clear argument there, Dermot. Thanks (no text) --- cq ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 06:29:16 ) ( 0 bytes ) Re: Are you from Premworld? --- george ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 08:36:57 ) ( 475 bytes ) +3 Yes, I remember that, George... --- Cynthia ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 06:44:30 ) ( 842 bytes ) Sight to the blind? Not quite ... --- cq ( Wed, Jan 19, 2005, 13:48:32 ) ( 138 bytes ) Re: the glasses - I remember him boasting about that! (n/t) (no text) --- creativejani ( Sat, Jan 22, 2005, 13:45:06 ) ( 0 bytes ) The real questions are... --- Cynthia ( Mon, Jan 17, 2005, 06:35:54 ) ( 522 bytes ) Re: An apology and a retraction? --- OTS ( Tue, Jan 18, 2005, 09:28:35 ) ( 471 bytes ) Re: An apology and a retraction. LOL --- yadot1 ( Sat, Jan 15, 2005, 23:16:31 ) ( 106 bytes ) +1 That was juvenile --- premie_spouse ( Sun, Jan 16, 2005, 10:58:22 ) ( 192 bytes )