|
|
|
I have a hard time to understand why on the free internet, and i do not mean wikipedia, anybody can refer to Introvigne as scholarly. This guy has, in his attempt to whitewash cults declared the people's temple and jim jones as a communist group, so that the mass suicide is seen as a consequence of an extreme political orientation rather than that of a cult.
See:
http://www.kelebekler.com/cesnur/txt/jon2.htmor for more information
http://www.kelebekler.com/cesnur/storia/gb24.htm i have given this information to andries already and i wonder why he isn't using nor mentioning this. Instead Zappaz has created a stub about Introvigne at Wikipedia, waiting that critics will fall in, to have then a reason to blow it up, the same way as with the rawat articles. Best is , to ignore it. We should build everything we gather up here. Get more perfect and accurate in the informations here and leave Wikipedia as it is. Toby
Modified by Toby at Thu, Dec 30, 2004, 11:05:24
|
