The Path to Prem --- prembio ( Thu, Jul 18, 2024, 18:12:08 ) (322 reads) ( 8373 bytes ) +47
|
- What did Lesley say, is it neccessary? Is it kind? Is it true? --- Susan ( Thu, Jul 18, 2024, 22:05:34 ) (211 reads) ( 1180 bytes ) +1
- Re: Mocking all of us and the Ideas that led us to --- prembio ( Fri, Jul 19, 2024, 01:42:16 ) (192 reads) ( 2038 bytes ) +3
- Re: Mocking all of us and the Ideas that led us to --- 13 ( Fri, Jul 19, 2024, 03:34:59 ) (213 reads) ( 1641 bytes ) +1
- not that part --- Susan ( Fri, Jul 19, 2024, 10:40:53 ) (215 reads) ( 348 bytes ) +1
- Re: Mocking all of us and the Ideas that led us to --- WeSea ( Fri, Jul 19, 2024, 14:26:37 ) (184 reads) ( 993 bytes ) +1
- Re: To be more specific --- prembio ( Fri, Jul 19, 2024, 16:06:57 ) (164 reads) ( 2911 bytes ) +1
- Re: To be more specific --- WeSea ( Fri, Jul 19, 2024, 21:16:09 ) (187 reads) ( 1971 bytes ) +1
- Re: To be more specific --- lesley ( Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 12:33:08 ) (177 reads) ( 330 bytes ) +1
- Re: To be more specific --- WeSea ( Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 23:35:54 ) (178 reads) ( 1162 bytes ) +3
- Re: To be more specific --- lesley ( Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 06:09:53 ) (224 reads) ( 871 bytes ) +2
- Re: To be more specific --- WeSea ( Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 09:39:13 ) (212 reads) ( 179 bytes ) +2
- Re: To be more specific --- tommo ( Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 11:01:05 ) (191 reads) ( 145 bytes ) +2
- yes it was! --- lesley ( Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 18:19:29 ) (142 reads) ( 902 bytes ) +1
- Re: yes it was! --- tommo ( Tue, Jul 23, 2024, 04:28:59 ) (144 reads) ( 1960 bytes ) +1
- Re: yes it was! --- lesley ( Tue, Jul 23, 2024, 06:58:11 ) (177 reads) ( 1681 bytes )
- Re: To be more specific --- prembio ( Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 18:50:14 ) (190 reads) ( 1047 bytes ) +1
- Re: To be more specific --- tommo ( Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 12:06:59 ) (153 reads) ( 1810 bytes )
- message deleted (no text) --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 14:07:20 ) (135 reads) ( 21 bytes )
- John Carpenter deserves my respect and support --- lakeshore ( Fri, Jul 19, 2024, 15:31:17 ) (284 reads) ( 2964 bytes ) +1
- Re: I presumed he wrote it as a cautionary tale --- prembio ( Fri, Jul 19, 2024, 16:20:59 ) (206 reads) ( 737 bytes ) +1
- Re: I presumed he wrote it as a cautionary tale --- lesley ( Fri, Jul 19, 2024, 18:43:58 ) (163 reads) ( 467 bytes ) +1
- Re: I presumed he wrote it as a cautionary tale --- prembio ( Fri, Jul 19, 2024, 22:34:53 ) (163 reads) ( 682 bytes ) +2
- Re: I presumed he wrote it as a cautionary tale --- lesley ( Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 02:48:06 ) (147 reads) ( 420 bytes )
- And what not... --- lakeshore ( Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 04:58:17 ) (194 reads) ( 2014 bytes ) +2
- ***best of*** --- Susan ( Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 12:18:31 ) (175 reads) ( 1180 bytes ) +1
- Agree --- 13 ( Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 13:04:49 ) (195 reads) ( 622 bytes ) +1
- Re: Agree, me too --- lesley ( Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 18:00:05 ) (168 reads) ( 714 bytes )
- Re: And what not... --- prembio ( Sat, Jul 20, 2024, 19:46:23 ) (140 reads) ( 100 bytes ) +1
- Right... --- lakeshore ( Sun, Jul 21, 2024, 13:36:53 ) (153 reads) ( 305 bytes )
|
|