GOK is apparently intent (as are so many premies) on differentiating between the terms "God", "Lord of the Universe", "Satguru", and now "inspirational speaker".

On one hand he reveres Rawat as his Satguru, yet attempts to belittle Rawat's former claims to be "Lord". He apparently accepts that Rawat used to claim he was "Lord of the Universe", but denies that that description has anything to do with him now.

Confused? We would be, if we believed a word of it.

Premies are keen on saying that experience is the key. They neglect to say that experience of Prem Rawat's world includes many things that are, as you have had the misfortune to experience, despicable.

Yet accountability for the abuse that has been propagated in Rawat's name has yet to be publicly acknowledged by Prem Rawat himself. Call it an unspoken denial. And by colluding with that denial, premies condone the abuse that has been perpetrated in Rawat's name.