I have no information about this affidavit whatsoever though it appears that it could be authentic.The little I know is that in legal terms the Respondent is the defendant and it could mean that Mr Rawat's minions are suing me for whatever and John MacGregor has done a deal with them to witness against me or it could just be part of their very strange public relations campaign or it could be phony.
At least this finally shows who was the good guy and patsy in all of this affair and for those who don't understand I mean ME. As anyone can tell from my posts on this Forum including the one yesterday to Joe and the reply to Jim I just finished typing I do not need validation from ex-premies nor do I engage in self-deception. While I am being criticised by both ex-premies and attacked by Rawat's minions I know I must be telling the truth.
