The truth is that statements such as K's only have meaning for the reader if the reader believes there is some absolute thing called truth, independent of the things that have truth. As no one has proved the existence of such a thing, believing in it is the same as believing in Santa Claus or God. (Actually believing in God makes more sense to me than believing in a disembodied 'truth'.)

May I suggest that K was speaking to those who have such a notion of a disembodied truth when he said

" Truth, being limitless, unconditioned, unapproachable by any path whatsoever, cannot be organized;...."

and in that context he is advising that it is nonsense to try and limit it, condition it, approach it by any path or organise it. Which is precisely what all religions and so-called spiritual leaders have been doing for millennia. Including Prem Rawat.