Hi Brian, nice to see you here. The most obvious para to me being the one about belief becoming dead, a creed a religion an imposition. Change the word belief to experience and it's a pretty good fit to many such statements that I remember guru maharaj ji and the mahatmas making.
Like the dalai lama with his coy little statements about not being god even though his silly followers think he is. I mean if Krishnamurti actually meant what he said, what was he doing going round sitting on stages saying it, why did he have any followers?
Truth is a pathless land. I can accept that as a profound statement about the nature of truth. I understand it to be an observation on the complexities that necessarily come up when wanting to arrive at the truth of some deep seated thing.
So what the heck does he mean when he says truth is limitless?