I hear what you are saying about Krishnamurti.

If truth is pathless, can't be approached via religion. If is can't be organised, belief is personal, organisations are crutches, preventing growth and discovery of absolute Truth.

If no one holds the key or authority to the Kingdom of Happiness and if the key is our own self, in whose development, purification and incorruptibility is the Kingdom of Eternity.

Can I ask what you consider the self, and how the development etc. take place?

No trick questions, just wondering.

It seems to me that what Kr was doing was trying to shake his followers into looking towards their own experience at the time, which is fair enough.

However, as I say, how does one approach this, what is the self, and, at the end of the day, does the experience found have any echoes within the words of former teachers? 

Best wishes,

Tempora