Eileen you are putting up a 'straw man' argument - as Andries points out no one (other than you) has suggested 'bullying to join' is an issue.

What is at issue is that anyone signing up for TheKeys has accepted a series of contractual commitments as well as giving personal details. These provide a very real practical compromise of an individual's capacity to challenge the Rawat cult in the way that RJC was suggesting he/she wanted to.

Points for anyone considering any kind of challenge to Rawatism to consider.

1. Rawat's followers are capable of extreme violence viz. the attack         on  Pat Halley and complicity of DLM hierarchy in allowing one of the attackers to leave the US.

2. The cult has a long history of using  contract law to impose gags on critics.

3. The cult has a history of using personal data to attack its detractors - CAC, One Reality, the Cat Box etc.

And if you want to put all that in the past Eileen - try this:

Senior figure in Elan Vital UK speaking to follower of Prem Rawat who has spent time in prison for violent assault, about a complaint concerning Elan Vital made to the UK Charity regulator : "We need to find out who is beind this and stop them."

What do you think  " and stop them" meant Eileen ? Complaints to Regulators are part of the democratic process - what basis should anyone be even thinking that a citizen's right should be impeded ?

The issue here is what to advise RJC - and anyone in his/her position - the only responsible answer must be - get yourself far away before you even think about protesting.

Nik