Anyway, how about giving Jonx the opportunity to catch up on some of that simple experience by removing him from this Forum for his own good.I don't see any reason to ban Jonx, or any other Rawat apologist who attempts to justify their belief in terms of 'mind'. The more they seek to explain the absurd, the less convincing they are to any reader, wavering or not as they may be on the brink of committing themselves to this crock of shit.
The tactic which the apologists use, is to argue about the left hook of the double whammy.....the experience, what it means, how great it is subjectively & all that. Get the monmots bogged down in speculation about consciouness,social consequences of involvement,& so on.
The right hook is the 'Master' concept which they've got away with throwing for far too long. I'd like Jonx to defend Rawat on the basis of his being an inspirational teacher,the qualities required of same,& whether or not his past & present followers could agree that there is an objective definition of what makes a teacher worthy of being titled master.
That's 'master' stripped of any Hindu/religious connotations of course.
Good post Paddy........we'll get to the bottom of it in the end.
