Good letters - good contrast...

Good letters - good contrast...
Re: Re: More letters re Charlotte Hofton's article -- Joe	Top of thread		Forum

Posted by:
Cynthia ^Ž

04/12/2005, 12:50:42
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators

Hi Joe,

I didn't get around to sending a letter this time around. Jim's was excellent though, and as all letters to the editor should be, short and to the point. Those are the ones the editors like to publish because they are in the business of selling advertising space.

I agree with you about the Rawat info website. It's so well done.

Modified by Cynthia at Tue, Apr 12, 2005, 12:52:21

Recommend Current page

Replies to this message

Sexcellent? What's that? --- NAR ( Tue, Apr 12, 2005, 12:52:35 ) ( 103 bytes ) +2

Oh jeeze! That was fast NAR, I already edited... (no text) --- Cynthia ( Tue, Apr 12, 2005, 12:54:11 ) ( 0 bytes ) +1

Bummer...... ah well, another joke bytes the dust! --- NAR ( Tue, Apr 12, 2005, 12:56:54 ) ( 215 bytes )

Re: Sexcellent? What's that? --- Juan Carlo Finesseti ( Wed, Apr 13, 2005, 14:53:33 ) ( 44 bytes ) +1

Yeah, sorry..... --- NAR ( Wed, Apr 13, 2005, 15:02:47 ) ( 251 bytes ) +1

Re: Yeah, sorry..... --- Juan Carlo Finesseti ( Thu, Apr 14, 2005, 15:04:57 ) ( 232 bytes )

Re: Good letters - good contrast... --- NAR ( Tue, Apr 12, 2005, 15:00:07 ) ( 234 bytes ) link