I didn't suggest the article was "balanced," at least not in the sense you suggest, because the journalist was doing her job to report that a "cult" was (under the radar screen  -- intentionally no publicity), propagating in a public hospital, under the ruse that it was art for therapy.  Sounds exactly like what a reporter is supposed to do -- inform the public about what was going on.

Rawat and Elan Vital are quite able to tell people (such as they do) about what they offer, but of course, they never tell you there are any legitimate disagreement with that, they never tell you about Rawat's history, and they never tell you there are any people who are not at all happy with either Rawat or knowledge.  This reporter did that, at least to some extent.

Her job is to inform the public, especially on a matter having to do with public policy.  She wasn't writing the article as an expose on Rawat or his followers, just what they were doing in the hospitial, and that it isn't as inocuous as it appears.

And she most certainly did interview the two premies!  She also got comment from the guy running the "art" program at the hospital, and was surprised he didn't know who Elan Vital or Rawat were.  So, you are full of it.

And how do you know she even looked at EPO?  She never mentions ex-premies even once.  People are not as stupid as you think.