The trouble with that line of thinking is that it gets you nowhere, real fast. Would you really claim that if you've never mainlined horse-tranquilliser, than your opinion about mainlining horse tranquillisers is irrelevant? Or that, as you have not lived your life without gurus, then your opinion of those of us who who *have* lived without them is irrelevant?

Your position prevents you from thinking sensibly about the wider world, which may be convenient for your Master, but is likely to prove inimicable to your own well-being.

And why do you assume that I have no experience of the light, the music, the nectar, the bliss? Had Rawat never been born, the kriya techniques he (rather badly) teaches would still have the same effect, wouldn't they?

What do you think?