>I would hesitate to start a crusade against supposedly complicit premies<

Absolutely, that's certainly not my intention. However I don't regard ignorance in this issue as a 'defence' - we can all find things in our lives about which it is (or would be) convenient not to know about. Premies as a group can not escape the criticism of being (as Sonster says in a post above) guilty of be 'enablers' of the harm that Rawat does.

>except perhaps the very small percentage of X-rated ones who know they are covering things up for the "lord," <

Even with the x rated premies I don't think that a 'crusade' would be appropriate. What is important is that the major facilitators of the Rawat cult should be publicly identified - and where they have legal or constitutional responsibility in Rawat's organisations - that they be made accountable in the way any other person holding such a position would be accountable.

Nik