I was totally unaware that I was so much influenced by my personal history and socialization by the anti-cult movement that all of my writings about the subject of SSB and cults are always biased, regardless of the effort I do to write a balanced, factual article and to provide a variety of viewpoints. So I think I will have to remove "my" article about SSB from Wikipedia because I do not want to mislead the readers of German ZDF broadcasting organization that refers to this article with my anti-cult propaganda. Also, I will inform the Free University in Amsterdam that the article about SSB in their official magazine about religious movements was written by an apostate and hence misleading and biased.

The good thing about it is that I am not an apostate of Prem Rawat so what I write about him or other gurus is not necessarily misleading. The only guru that I can not write a good story about is my former guru and his organization. Though I was intensely involved with him and went often to group meetings, and have read many of his discourses during the nine years that I was his follower, following many of his teachings and meditation practices, I simply cannot give complete, accurate information about him because I have become a critical ex-follower. So, may be you can write about SSB then I can write about Prem Rawat to ensure the public reads articles and stories without distortions and propaganda.

What is even more interesting, is that followers of cults, sects and new religious movements in some cases do not give a detailed rebuttal to accusations such as hypocrisy by the leader, contradictions etc. but instead refer just to these general articles to support their point of view and seem to think that this suffices as a rebuttal. This is the case for followers of Scientology, Jehovah Witnesses and recently follower of Prem Rawat "yadot" here on this forum.