You can't doubt an experience with meditation since if you've had it, you know it. 

That's plain wrong Dave. You are capable of doubting anything and everything.

So the doubt must be about the validity of Maharaji.  Which means that premies' existence hangs not upon an experience that they've had through meditation but rather it hangs on one man, namely Maharaji.

Hmmm... very shrewd Dave. You're a lawyer, aren't you.

It's interesting because by analysing people's words a great deal can be gleaned about what is important to them. 

Indeed!

Now there's no criticism from me if you consider Maharaji, just one man, to be that important but it's not how most people want to live their lives.

So why do they need you to tell them how they should be living their lives? He's merely offering something that some have found of extreme value. Why get in the way? Afraid they can't make up their own minds? Or is it that you guys have a stake in raising their doubts?