Rawatism is based on a system of closed logic. The very fact that someone has been initiated and has then rejected Rawat is, within that logic system, unequivocal evidence that the individual 'didn't get it'. There really is no argument to be made,  in the end one either 'believes' or 'does not believe'. Of course premies will reject the use of the word 'believe' because that would at the very least open up a semantic possibility for the  closed logic on which they rely, to be questioned.

It doesn't matter how much evidence supporting alternative perspectives is provided, if the asessment is made via a system of closed logic - the answer will always be the same.