>And actually, who the f** are you to tell TPRF what to do with funds they collect? <

I understand that it's a difficult thing for you as a premie to grasp - but out here in the non cult world there is no requirement for qualification to be able to speak, to have an opinion or to argue for a particular perspective. Who am I ? the point is I'm not anyone in particular - but like six billion other humans I've a right to a view on any entity that acts publicly.

The discussion on this forum is about Rawat and the organisations and people that back him, but any and every Charity, Trust or other philanthropic setup that seeks funds from the public and/or claims to act in charitable or humanitarian benefit is public property so far as comment and criticism go.

>And no one is asking you to trust TPRF with anything.<

That is precisely what a publicly active charity is doing - it's asking everyone of us to 'trust' that it's acting with due diligence'. And it is a matter for the public collectively and individually to test that due diligence.

> Face it. yo don't like TPRF doing this type of stuff, because it disallow your hateful verbosity.<

Clearly it doesn't inhibit my criticism of TPRF - in fact the adoption of a Humanitarian facade arouses even further my suspicions about the validity of TPRF. I don't like TPRF because I believe it promotes a morally bankrupt personality cult - and no amount of 'humanitarian' aid will excuse what I see as TPRF's fundamental inadequacy.

>Auditors - According to Guidestar, the auditors are KPMG, not a 'premie'. - Your comparison of Enron w/ TPRF, shows the magnitude of your lack of grip with reality. You'r nuts.<

The issue is that a financial audit is not an unequivocal seal of approval - as Enron or Maxwell have proved in the past. I didn't say TPRF was audited by premies - I raised the question what if ? Are you saying that no Rawat related entity has ever used a firm of auditors that is owned and run by premies ? Would you consider that not to be a conflict of interest ?

>There are hundreds of thousands of students of Maharaji in India and Sri Lanka, and what is wrong with them helping out?<

Are you saying that TPRF's 'tsunami fund' is going to be directed at followers of Rawat ? If that is the case it raises some very serious questions about just who will benefit and how they would qualify for benefit.