>You are indeed someone in particular. Smeone that has decided to become an "ex" of something and as such to measure everything within that. A psychologist would have a field day with you.<

Again, that premie obsession with 'psychological dysfunction'  - no matter how rational the argument, no matter how civil the discussion, anyone criticising Rawat must be guilty of the sin of being psychologically defective. Oh well ........

>For you is is all "morally corrupted". Again: the world divided in two: they and I. "I am morally above others", "they are corrupted". The trait of a hate group member.<

If humans are creatures with a capacity for morality then it is surely reasonable that such a capacity is exercised - that means making moral judgements. If the moral judgements we make are limited only to those circumstances which immediately affect us as individuals we necessarily create an insular world. Far from being an act of 'superiority',  to honestly make judgements about the behaviour and actions of other humans, in my view requires the humilty to say "that could be me". That premies see hate and division in processes of judgement and criticism says far more about premie thinking than about the judgements made about them and Rawat.

>Are you saying that TPRF's 'tsunami fund' is going to be directed at followers of Rawat This is fascinating: you only mis-read just exactly what you think... What I said that there are hundreds of thousands of "followers" of Maharaji ij India and Sri Lanka, and that these people can help if the want.<

 I asked you a question - you clarified it -see that's how discussion and debate works. Although your referrence to India and Shri Lanka is hardly related to the issues affecting TPRF.

This is a tedious conversation, you and others here are just too entrenched in your own distorted reality field. I'm outta here.

You mean that you are so unused to people disagreeing with you that you need to go away and hide under a blanket. Soooooo Huuuuung