Disagreement or semantic quibble?
Re: No conspiracy theory necessary...(OT) -- Cynthia Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Jim ®

12/23/2004, 12:01:06
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




Cynthia,

I think there are some excellent reasons to think that premies have conspired to portray their cult and its leader falsely in Wikipedia and elsewhere.  I'm not just talking about them talking with each other.  I guess that could literally be a conspiracy as well but it's such a trite use of the word.  No, I mean, resorting to tricks like, for example, pretending to not be premies when in fact they are or otherwise hiding their true relationship with the cult.  And worse, perhaps.  Of course these would only be conspiracies if they planned or coordinated such deceits. 

I mean, it sounds like Toby caught Jossi posting under a couple of names pretending to be two different people.  I don't think it's too far-fetched to suspect that these guys actually discuss and coordinate such "efforts".  So there's a good conspiracy theory.  No?

 






Modified by Jim at Thu, Dec 23, 2004, 12:15:12

Previous Recommend Current page Next

Replies to this message