Re: Let's talk about Trump

Re: Let's talk about Trump
Re: Re: Let's talk about Trump -- Jim	Top of thread	Post Reply	Forum

Posted by:
lesley ^®

04/19/2024, 12:12:48
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Forum Admin

Post Reply

okay so I read that article. I hope you're not suggesting it's an example of critical thinking! It's an opinion piece.

It did answer one of my questions - looks like Trump has already taken the position of embodiment of the Constitution and declared himself defender of the blue collar worker.

And he compares Trump to Stalin, Pol Pot and Hitler - ie making the same observation of him being a monster that I did. Though going on to say that he is a good monster - can't remember the words he used but suggesting he is a saviour not an oppressor.

Jim, no more articles please. If you want to talk talk, use your own words. And if you want to converse with me then next step would be to answer my other question - do you think there would be fighting if Trump were put in jail?

Current page

Replies to this message

Lesley, that's an amazing distortion on your part --- Jim ( Fri, Apr 19, 2024, 13:17:25 ) ( 6719 bytes ) +1

ah --- lesley ( Fri, Apr 19, 2024, 17:44:12 ) ( 1289 bytes ) +1

Re: ah --- Jim ( Fri, Apr 19, 2024, 17:50:25 ) ( 310 bytes ) +2

Re: ah --- lesley ( Sat, Apr 20, 2024, 12:43:36 ) ( 403 bytes ) +1

Google's impartial? Are you serious? --- Jim ( Sat, Apr 20, 2024, 12:59:52 ) ( 978 bytes ) +1

Are you serious? --- lesley ( Sat, Apr 20, 2024, 18:23:26 ) ( 1998 bytes ) +1

Re: Are you serious? --- Jim ( Sun, Apr 21, 2024, 13:23:39 ) ( 913 bytes ) +1

the wonders of goog --- lesley ( Sun, Apr 21, 2024, 15:58:08 ) ( 1628 bytes ) img +1

the left and the right of it --- lesley ( Sun, Apr 21, 2024, 17:34:59 ) ( 2120 bytes ) +1

It’s in Australia too - take a look --- Jim ( Mon, Apr 22, 2024, 14:17:47 ) ( 1062 bytes ) link +1

Re: It’s in Australia too - take a look --- lesley ( Mon, Apr 22, 2024, 17:07:26 ) ( 713 bytes ) +1

The question is "Why?" --- Jim ( Tue, Apr 23, 2024, 13:41:37 ) ( 263 bytes ) +1

Re: The question is "Why?" --- lesley ( Wed, Apr 24, 2024, 17:43:05 ) ( 3913 bytes ) img +1

Re: The question is "Why?" --- Jim ( Thu, Apr 25, 2024, 16:49:07 ) ( 11.5 KB ) link

Re: ah --- meryl ( Sat, Apr 20, 2024, 17:15:51 ) ( 25.1 KB ) +1

Re: ah --- Jim ( Sat, Apr 20, 2024, 18:14:32 ) ( 2755 bytes ) +1

Re: ah --- meryl ( Sat, Apr 20, 2024, 18:54:36 ) ( 2316 bytes ) +1

So much wrong about all that - but let's look at the Carroll case --- Jim ( Sun, Apr 21, 2024, 12:23:58 ) ( 3332 bytes ) +1

Re: So much wrong about all that - but let's look at the Carroll case --- meryl ( Sun, Apr 21, 2024, 15:27:08 ) ( 785 bytes ) +2

Re: So much wrong about all that - but let's look at the Carroll case --- meryl ( Sun, Apr 21, 2024, 16:25:36 ) ( 316 bytes )
Re: So much wrong about all that - but let's look at the Carroll case --- Jim ( Sun, Apr 21, 2024, 18:17:35 ) ( 167 bytes ) +1

Re: So much wrong about all that - but let's look at the Carroll case --- meryl ( Sun, Apr 21, 2024, 18:38:53 ) ( 94 bytes ) +1

Re: So much wrong about all that - but let's look at the Carroll case --- Jim ( Sun, Apr 21, 2024, 20:50:49 ) ( 141 bytes )