Criticism BY (rather than of) ex-premies is indeed directed primarily toward Prem Rawat. Premies who occasionally post on this forum who spout Rawat's POV may well also be subject to critical responses to their posts. Such is the nature of dialogue.If any criticism in response to those posts is seen as "waging a campaign", I would suggest that that says more about the blinkered mindset of the student/PWK than about exes.
EV claims that some exes have contacted premies' employers. We have only EV's word for it, since no ex that I know of has declared as much on this Forum. We do know however, that EV has contacted the employers of several exes. Whether this constitutes a "campaign" or not is open to interpretation.
As for Ron Geaves' "answer" - it is only valid if you accept (as he does) that Rawat and EV represent religious/spiritual values. In fact both Rawat and EV deny any connection with religion or spirituality (according to their websites). Therefore the whole basis of Geaves' apology is based on misrepresentation and consequently invalid.