As anyone who advanced beyond third grade reading skills would realize after reading my post, I don't have any problem with you quoting Mischler and Dettmers. I have a problem with you taking issue with Andries for doing the same in his reply, when it doesn't fit into your agenda.You have smugly refused to dialogue with a number of people on this forum for supposed faux pas' of reasoned discussion, yet your own cavalier manipulation of words is truly "breathtaking", as witnessed in your response to me. You seem to have very little regard for truth or reason.
Andries on the other hand has done alot of research about Rawat, looked at both sides of the issue and kept a pretty open mind throughout the whole process. He even went to an introductory event. For this I have alot of respect for him.
Why don't you answer Jim's posts below? Is he too beneath you? Until you do, I've lost all interest in dialoguing with you. You can live happily ever after in your little fairy tale. You are beyond boring.
