>He is offering to be a "spiritual guide" to people <

How does this not contradict what EV says in it's advertising ?

EV and TPRF say that what Rawat offers has nothing to do with religion. Bear in mind that terms used in advertising and promotion are judged on the basis of common usage as understood by any reasonable person. In common usage religion and 'spritual' have very strong associations, such that most English speakers would see one as indicating the other. Can you explain whether you believe EV and TPRF are misrepresenting what Rawat offers - or alternatively can you explain why spiritual has nothing to do with religion ?