Yes, deletion does seem a rather paranoid response, although at the time I read it there was only Falcon's initial post, the gist of which I remember.

My reply would've been that setting the mujahaddin on Rawat is irrelevant. He already is an anathema or whatever they call it, because Muslims believe that Mohammed was the last of the Prophets, & so anyone claiming that status after him is automatically a fraud. This was the justification given for the persecution of the Ba' hais in Iran after the revolution.

As far as I know, apart from the words in the Arti song which refer to the Koran, neither Rawat, nor indeed his father before him , has ever attempted to enlist Mohammed into the ranks of the previous Masters from whom they claim their own descent .

Why that was is a separate topic.