Hi Reporter,

I appreciate you staying around here to chat but I cant help but notice how you wrap up many of  your snappy summaries  with the idea of how "simple" it all is: a self-congratularory, self awarded QED stuck on the end of you argument, as if to convince us all that your reasoning is self-evident. That one little gesture is the hallmark of being a premie. (I was one for 25 years and I used to do it).

I would like to tell you Reporter that you are in the wrong arena for such superficiality. Around here you yourself have some very specific questions to answer before your point of view can be even remotely credible, let alone qualify you to hand out blithe assurances about how self-evidently simple it all is.

You (under the influence of PRand his use of language) are throwing around words such as Knowledge, within, peace, and many more. Plus you are also bandying about the concepts of a man who reveals happiness to others, deserves gratitude, and "offers" to the world at large an exceptional inspirational relationship.(and much more). Any one of these concepts is "deep" to put it mildly and provides much to reflect on in many areas of human wisdom, and that much to even establish what it is we are talking about when we say "peace, within, spiritual knowledge,inspirational speaker guru etc. But to you Reporter it is all "simple". Hmmmm.

 Reporter, I know for a fact that you know very little about the obove concepts and words, but you have been conditioned to believe that you do. We were all like that. That's how the cult makes you, thats probably why you are in a cult.

Take that concept "Knowledge" for example. Exactly what is it? What is its context? Where does it fit in in the spiritual apectrum/history of humanity? As a premie you have no idea. As Rawat's pupil I know you will have no concrete clue. The beautiful light, the sweet music, the warm breath experience, the nectar (all hermetically placed by the Master beyond open discussion under the labels "secret techniques nos 1-4"), what do you know about Knowledge in the context of those commonplace religious experiences? Nothing. I bet you would wriggle verbally if it came to making ONE factual statement about what exactly is your relationship with such a complex of esoteric phenomena. You'd probably deny that clear conceptual statements about  what K actually is, are possible. Ho hum Reporter. wake up to some reflection on what is going on here.Simple you say!?

The only simple thing around here Reporter is you. The wide-eyed cocky and the blurred way you have been conditioned to think about yourself and human inner life in general.  From where I stand as an EX premie, a FORMER premie, someone who struggled to go BEYOND the naivety of the Rawat package, you Reporter, are a devout religious person practicing a faith based religion.

And yes, for such faith based, fundamentalist practicioners, as we all know,  it is simple.

Love

Bryn