You charge ex-premies of disgracefully distorting facts and ignoring things they don't want to see. What about the testimony of Susan Haupt then? Is she lying?

Even when Jagdeo's conduct two whole decades later was again reported to Charanand, Jagdeo was not immediately taken off tour.

But let's take it a step further. Just how did Maharaji 'act immediately' upon hearing of cases of sexual and other misconduct. Reports variously are of ashram brothers being assigned as guards for these Mahatmas and them being sent at a later date back to India. With the exception of one case that I have heard of, they maintained their Mahatma status. Even in the case of Fakiranand, after he attempted murder, according to Donners, Maharaji's actions consisted of having him smuggled out of the country. He also continued in his capacity as Mahatma afterwards in other places.

Do you think that this is appropriate action on the part of Maharaji?