Professor David Lane makes some brief comments on hans, but in the Rahdasaomi and/or Santmat hans is a very minor guru and considered outside the lineage.

Professor Ron Geaves(long time devotee and revisionist for prem) told me that David Lane made 'an academic mistake' which Geaves has yet to show us.

I did meet an Inidan journalist who remembers hans from the 50s and said he remembered some newspaper articles about hans getting flack for improper behaviour. However, I doubt that such an article would hold any weight as every guru gets accused of being evil by their opponents.

The only legacy that hans left was his book 'Hans Yog Prakash' which is a mapping of prem's 'devotional' mind. (Yes I said MIND). I have no doubt that prem's mysogeny and bloody mindedness towards the rest of the human race comes from the model presented in that book.

So you don't need to dig up any dirt on hans. He has left his own mess.Anyone can read his own words to see what he was and prem has become.