Sorry Mick... Democracy depends on truth to operate.
Re: Re: Vietnam or Iraq??? -- MickCable Top of thread Forum
Posted by:
Danny ®

07/22/2005, 15:57:18
Author Profile

Edit
Alert Moderators




As this is WAY off topic I won't belabor the point but will state that while we spew our resentment and anger for m and his deceptive manner...his inability to be held accountable and his blatant lies about the past, present and perhaps future.... we accept lies from those that have the ability to cause us the greatest harm (politicians) and don't stand up for holding our elected officials accountable???

Sorry bud.... this makes absolutely NO SENSE! Or should I say this is hypocrisy at its finest.

And BTW... perhaps you need to review your history. As a jewish person that has family ties directly involved with what occurred in Nazi Germany as well as direct family involvement in the actual founding of Isreal, your comparing Saddam to Hitler is quite offensive.

While Saddam was a brutal dictator... the United States was actively involved in support of his tyranny, by supplying his weapons (chemical and other WMD) and by supporting the War against Iran..... while Saddam invaded Kuwait... that action was originally (by diplomatic indicators) acceptable by the US govt (Reagan, first and then Bush 1 in particular).... and finally as the no fly zone was quite effective... Saddam had been contained as planned. Truth is there were no WMD, no links to 9/11 and worst of all by invading we now have are responsible for increasing the amount of terrorists in Iraq and worldwide. This is a lose/lose situation.

Sorry ... Saddam was no Hitler and the attempt is not only weak but ignorant!







Previous Recommend Current page Next

Replies to this message