This effort by Rawat to connect himself to the U.N. reminds me of something.  What is it?  Maybe a scrawny dork trying to pledge at an athletic fraternity, or a nouveau riche couple trying to be accepted at the country club.  Any example of people trying to be something they are not.

 It's EMBARASSING! 

Rawat will never gain the real endorsement of the U.N. or any of the public legitimacy he is trying to establish for himself.  Why not?  Because of one little item in the speech he gave in San Francisco.  I have highlighted the offending sentence:

"The desire for peace transcends every barrier. Even those who have been incarcerated desire peace. Those who have little to eat also desire peace. And those sitting in giant mansions desire peace.  Peace doesn't see age. Need and necessities don't see age or qualifications or social structure. A need is a need is a need.

The good news is: All peace requires is a little effort, and no money has to be spent. Why? Because peace dwells in the heart of every single living human being. It does not have to be imported. People do not have to be lectured into it. It is sufficient to be given the opportunity to seek the peace inside, to look within, and to see that resource that is possible. "

What is this little sentence all about?  What exactly is Rawat proposing?  Let me explain for the U.N. delegates and distinquished diplomats.   Rawat's solution is that people who want peace need to be shown something, something that he, Rawat himself,  just happens to be the shower of, something that he calls "Knowledge."

Rawat's solution has absolutely no chance of being adopted.  What exactly does Rawat expect, some sort of resolution stating: "Whereas Rawat is the revealer of peace within, it is resolved that everybody should receive Knowledge."???? 

It's bad enough that "distinquised" people have to sit there and listen to such Rawatian phrases as "a need is a need is a need."   Who is going to take this seriously?