What's your problem with calling a sociopath a sociopath? Do you not know it means merely someone without a conscience, someone without a sense of ethics (I would say a sense of the reality of other people)?

And have you failed to notice that is *exactly* what Rawat preaches? He offers a blank check to premies ... that they can ignore ethical considerations. No karma, no consequence, nothing matters (provided they are suitably devoted ...)

And sure there may be many "successful" sociopaths in the Wonderful World of Work (that figures, right?), but what the heck has that got to do with Rawat's apparent sociopathy?