Of course I have read what you had to say. I was merely pointing out that whether a practice makes an individual happy or not, is no necessary indication of its moral worth.I am glad you are clear on that point, but puzzled you did not see fit to mention it yourself. The omission of such a salient fact could be taken as an indication that you had overlooked its importance.
I am also puzzled by your reference to "idee fixees". Premies certainly entertain rather fixed notions about Rawat, but I've found exes to have a much wider range of attitudes. You might like to consider whether it is possible that other folk have also been responding to the bias implied by your omission, rather than displaying any "idee fixees".
Jonti
-- never a premie
