|
|
|
I am well aware of the "selection bias" in my group of premies and commented on it in the post. There are, no doubt, good reasons why the premies I know in this area meet the happy and successful criteria. I'm not interested in the reasons. I am merely showing that when I say I know many happy and successful premies I am telling the truth. However common sense indicates that the chances of this being a unique group are so small that it shows that there are many other happy and successful premies.
|
